Labor's next leader?

Anthony Albanese appears to be an uncontested favourite to take on the role as the new federal Labor leader.

His position as frontrunner was reinforced after possible contender Chris Bowen withdrew from the contest on Wednesday afternoon.

So far it is a one-horse race, unless another potential cnadidate Jim Chalmers decides running as deputy leader is not enough. Mr Chalmers said he is still deciding on whether he'll contest for the top job and will announce his decision Thursday.

According to The New Daily, Mr Bowen said he did not think he would have won the leadership contest against Mr Albanese.

“I’ve been on the phone to colleagues. I’ve been very pleased with the response – it’s clear to me that I would have majority support in the actual caucus ballot,” he said.

“But it’s also clear to me – I’m a realist – that Albo would win the rank and file, for good reason – he’s a popular character … Hence I have reached the view that it would be unlikely for me to win the ballot.”

Unless another challenger comes forward a ballot can be avoided and the new leadership team put in place swiftly.

Who do you think is the best person for the job?

46 comments

I believe it should be three totally new faces for a fresh start. There is a lot of talent on Labor’s side. Claire O’Neill is highly qualified and lovely to look at. Jim Chalmers is another pretty face with a well qualified cv as Dr Chalmers. There are many others. To go up against ScoMo and his disorganised and unengaged ghosts will take strength to withstand the usual abuse from LNP. Albo may have been promised this for a long time but I suspect it is a mistake not to dip into the huge talent pool and come up with three fresh young faces.

I would love to see Anthony Albanese be successful. He is going to have a hard road to travel after all the abuse the Labour Party have had in the past from the Murdoch press and Clive Palmer, not to mention that two faced git Scott Morrison.  

 

Shorten said the task of rebuilding the party would be "one for the next leader of the Labor Party"..and in my opinion that will take some time. I am sure Albanese is a nice human being but not leader material. Actually I don’t think we have any “leaders” in either party. I do like Tanya P a lot..but she knows her limits and I am glad she’s out of the running. 

The ALP did not get it “wrong”..the truth is, they did not get it right in the first place. Shorten revealed too much, too soon..they had no concrete plans (not to say the LNP is any better). Hinting that you will make people poorer before you are even elected, scared off even many of the rusted on Labor voters, when there was no need to. His plans for franking credits and negative gearing does not affect most people..so why bring it up before an election?  With hindsight, perhaps he wishes he had waited.. then only those who were affected would have been up in arms.



 Sophie, I had a lightbulb moment as my dear wife would say just before I got to the polling station. I saw this beam of light and heard a voice saying "how good is that."Glad I did!

 

Yep, guess we’re all scratching our heads and wondering, what happened? Why did Labor lose the unlosable election? Simple, greed usually wins. People didn’t want to lose their franking credits and negative gearing. Don’t mess with retirees, they’ll fight you tooth and nail.

At least Plibersek and Albanese had it right when they said “Labor bit off a bit more than it could chew.” Agree Sophie, they should have ditched the franking credit policy and snuck it in later if they won. I feel Albanese and Tanya could make a good team if they worked closely together. 


Labor were up front with the electorate about what they planned to do. The LNP were not open about their plans so we are now left with uncertainty. My hunch is they will raise the gst very soon to 15% which will affect most retirees and pensioners much more than franking credits and negative gearing would have. What is most disappointing is that so many people did not seem to care about the danger of climate change. We have only a few years left before we reach the tipping point and face extinction along with most life on this planet. I know 3 couples who stood to lose a lot from the franking credit policy but they voted Labor regardless because they care about the future for their children, grand children and the planet. 

It’s disheartening to see conservatives still garbaging Labor and potential leaders. You won the election, chose your man to lead us in spite of his brandishing a big lump of coal in parliament and supporting Adani (and Clive Palmer’s big coal interests). Let Labor choose their leader unhindered to get on with providing decent opposition. If Albanese is the new leader that’s ok because he has a strong sense of social justice which will be sorely needed to argue against injustice, greed and social division which may worsen over the next 3 years.

Although Labor lost the "unlosable" election because of policies and maybe because of some personalities, the main point that was indisputable was that they gave a united front. The last thing Labor needs right now is infighting and as Albanese was the rank and file choice, although overruled by the parliamentary party, and he wants to stand then there should be no other candidate. At least then, Labor's rebuilding will start with on outward show of solidarity.

There have been some rumblings about Albanese being too far left but Labor is a consensus party and the leader is required to adopt the policies of the party. So, having a leader with ideas that are too far one way or the other are an irrelevance. Albanese has carefully cultivated the media over the years, is popular with all sides of the political spectrum and presents an acceptable choice as Labor leader IMHO.

Oh well, onwards and upwards for some ... meanwhile, back to basics for others.

Albo is a popular bloke. But seeing as Labor is in tatters - only time will tell if he can bring it back to where it once was.

Representing the worker, the battler and of course the pensioner. Seemed to me that this hasnt been evident for a long time.

Not since they fell under the influence of these Greens who are really on the nose here - they lost many of their previous supporters.

Even CMFEU Union men were handing out how to vote Liberal cards in Qld reported on TV.

Can Albo fix it is the question on most lips. Not unless he dumps the Greens

Labor MPs may be down in heart but the party is not in tatters. It was the Liberal Party that was in tatters before the election...that can’t be denied....and it remains to be seen if their disunity is still present. Same for the Nats because Barnaby Joyce wants the leadership back.

You state: “...only time will tell if he [Albo] can bring it back to where it once was...Representing the worker, the battler and of course the pensioner. Seemed to me that this hasn’t been evident for a long time.”

“Representing the worker and the battler”: Labor wanted to increase the basic wage, reinstate penalty rates and increase wages for childcare workers. 

“Representing pensioners”: Labor wanted to increase Newstart. Labor increased pensions dramatically back in 2008.

Labor has not fallen under influence of the Greens and thus lost supporters. On the contrary, Labor lost many supporters to the Greens many years ago. That has been a conundrum for Labor.

totally agree...do not think Albo is going to be the "Messiah" Labor are looking for!!  Wayne Swan said when they lost the last election that the worst thing they did was get tied up with the Greens...pity they did not heed his advice this time around!

Many think "Albo" is a reasonable bloke, a nice fella. I probably thought he seemed OK too until his nasty display after the election. This made Shorten's parting demeanour and comment look extremely gracious by comparison (and gracious it was.) We, the electors, need bigger potential leaders than that.

The Labor party needs search harder.

Many think "Albo" is a reasonable bloke, a nice fella. I probably thought he seemed OK too until his nasty display after the election. This made Shorten's parting demeanour and comment look extremely gracious by comparison (and gracious it was.) We, the electors, need bigger potential leaders than that.

The Labor party needs search harder.

I think the LNP will be delighted if Albos wins Labor's top job as its more of the same old same old.

Chalmers was reportedly the architect of the Franking Credit policy that saw self funded retirees turn on Labor in droves

I would be interested to see who else they have got, a fresh face (and policies) is needed not recycled wannabes

There have been a couple of women's names thrown up. Regardless of who they choose as leader, I think Penny Wong has had far too much imput. Penny and her mates at the CFMMEU, which should be deregulated, must be sent packing. 

Penny Wong showed her absolute arrogance when refusing to shake hands after a debate with Simon Birmingham

I do not think Penny Wong is arrogant. I think she is possibly the smartest person in parliament.

Penny Wong explains why she didn't shake Simon Birmingham's hand - Australia Votes - Federal Election 2019 - Politics - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)9 May 2019 · Penny Wong says she didn't shake Simon Birmingham's hand after a debate yesterday because he was playing politics with the national interest by mischaracterising Labor's policy with China.

 

Very interesting article today by Joe Hildebrand, on News.com.au website, with 10 reasons why Labor lost the supposedly unlosable election.

Its probably the best and accurate 10 reasons I have heard yet on why most, including himself, got the result so wrong

Posted 12 minutes ago

Victorian MP Richard Marles is likely to become the Labor deputy leader.

By the time of the next election in 2022, Labor will have been in Opposition for 23 of the last 29 years. Miserable.

Labor, fluffed around with restoring penalty rates and wage subsidies to childcare workers, but it completely and utterly ignored what voters wanted to hear and that is how to grow the economy faster. A large majority of voters judge the Coalition to be better managers of the economy than Labor. This is despite the facts of GDP so that's a revelation.

Climate change isn’t the number one issue facing Australians, although the media did their best to force feed voters. To most Aussies climate change is happening but we are not a big polluter, so it can go on the back burner. I don’t agree with that myself because if all small polluters were put in the one basket, it would make up a heavy load. Anyway, it did Labor no good carrying on about climate change and electric cars, middle Australia didn’t want to hear this at this point.

Some of the policies Labor took to the election especially around negative gearing and franking credits were the right policy to help bring the budget back to balance, but, they pushed it too soon and were too aggressive and too complex. Shorten set himself up for a fight with the baby boomers and he got it.

Bill Shorten was the wrong leader. Tough to say but the public see him as boring and lacked personality. On the other hand and IMHO, it’s not that voters love Scott Morrison, they just can’t stand Shorten. If the ALP does not pull up its socks and work hard to change their image, then they can forget about winning the next election.

I couldnt agree more Banjo, particularly with your last paragraph

Isn't there just a wee possibility(sic) that the ordinary man and women in the street could be more politically and intellectually mature than the 'Progressive' (regressive) left would ever give them credit for and it was Labor policies that were rejected?

Well thought out, well said Banjo!

 

LJ, I agree. As an example Banjo and other rusted ons conveniently fail to mention the Labor policy which hits workers with a 2% budget defecit tax while at the same time saying they would have surpluses every year, and bigger surpluses than the LNP could manage. LOL, A smarter move would have been to call it a budget surplus tax, and not sack the poor worker for asking Bill Shorten to clarify the tax. That action by the state labor government scared voters and cemented Labor's position.

Lets face it Bill was their best option. They all fell into line quietly, gosh even the ex Labor leaders were reunited for public appearnces. I imagine most in Labor, Unions and Greens were quietly thinking.. dont F... it up Bill, but the temptation was too great and the polls provided enough rope. We are all pleased we could see that at that crucial time. It would have been much more painful to experience with a Labor victory.

the sooner Di Natali is gone the better too!!

Why? Please make your response intelligent rather than just Green hating BS.

Doctors save people who have been struck by illness or injury. Politics is about reducing the number Doctors need to save. Richard Di Natali and Kerryn Phelps have value in their experiences, we just need to somehow extract that value.

NY19 I do not respond to rudeness!

FirstPrev1234NextLast(page 3/4)
46 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment