Old Age Pension

This was written by Jenny Macklin on 3/6/2008. If you are on the old age pension you should read this full Statement. I'm trying to find out what party will be more sympathetic to us and I'm guessing it's the Labor Party.


[i]......By the 1950s, pensioners had moved from having to report to their local post office to receive a cash payment to receiving a hand-written cheque; in 1962 the residency test was halved to ten years; in 1966 Aboriginal Australians were granted full rights to the pension; and in 1975 the right of appeal was introduced.

And the Whitlam Government's introduction of benchmarking the pension to workers' earnings has seen a doubling of the pension in real terms since 1972. In his landmark 1972 policy speech at the Blacktown Civic Centre, Whitlam committed Labor to 'raise the basic pension rate to 25 percent of average weekly earnings.' A benchmark first achieved in 1974.

In 1983 the Hawke Government's Statement of Accord agreed to maintain the basic rate of pension at or above 25 percent of average earnings, a commitment reaffirmed by the government's statement, Better Incomes: Retirement Income Policy into the Next Century released in 1989. A series of increases achieved this benchmark over the life of the Labor government.

Under the Hawke and Keating Governments the pension increased from 24 percent of Male Total Average Weekly Earnings under the Fraser Government in 1982 to 25.8 percent on leaving office in 1996.

In 1990 the Hawke Government introduced the bereavement payment equivalent to 14 weeks pension payable to the surviving member of a pensioner couple.

And in 1994 the Keating Government introduced the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card.

Australia's Age Pension has endured through most of the 20th century and into the 21st century - 100 years of profound social and economic change, two world wars, a depression, recessions and booms - and, today, it continues its vital role in providing income support on the basis of need to older Australians. [/i]
http://www.jennymacklin.fahcsia.gov.au/statements/Pages/centenary_age_pension_05june08.aspx

74 comments

No worries koko, I was listening to the radio in the car a little while ago and heard Bolt talking about Laurie Oakes' little skirmish with Mark Latham. Apparently Oakes ignored him at a media meeting and Latham said that Oakes cowered away from him, in other words he called him a coward. Oakes came back with the retort that when Latham was leader of the Opposition and almost became our PM, he was in Tasmania and was afraid to go out the front door and speak to the workers in the forestry industry, he ducked out the back door. Oakes said is was the worst show of cowardice he'd seen in thirty years. Bolt said and I agree 'Why didn't Oakes tell us about it?' It might have helped us determine just how crappy his character is. He didn't tell us about it because he was afraid to stick his neck out.

Kerry had him on the ropes about the broadband, he didn’t have a clue. Not a good night for Tony.



It was a 'gotcha' question that I doubt if anyone could answer. As one wag put it on talk back radio he "was going to ask the carpenter how many nails he had put in his house". I think OBrien made a goose of himself when trying to trap Abbott, much like Jana Wendt did with Pauline Hanson years ago.



Remember this NBN started as a $5Billion scheme which has blown out to $43Billion in 3 years. With Labor's record on BER and pink batts etc I predict the cost will more than double over the supposed 8 years it will take to complete baring no stuff ups and over-runs, which is almost assured.



Most importantly has anyone bothered to find out what it will cost the end user -- US -- for using this super-duper speed. At present I have ADSL2+ with 5GB peak + 5 GB offpeak for $29.95/month bundled which is ample for me and quite fast enough. Seriously I doubt if I could even afford this NBN when it eventually goes past my property



With technology improving all the time it appears that wireless is the way to go so one is not tied to a cable.

They must be all "gotcha" questions that Abbott is asked as he is unable to answer most of them--on anything--

Most importantly has anyone bothered to find out what it will cost the end user—

I saw a figure of $100.00 per month some time ago, but don't have the info anymore.

......McCrann's article to- day is worth reading though.

Further, the Abbott plan is a clear plus because it won't lock us into a particular fixed broadband network. Because it's basically upgrading what we've already got; what we've already sunk.



No, it's not going to deliver blistering 100 Mbps speeds to just about everyone - as the NBN will do; promises to do, some time in the next decade. But that's because there's no point in doing that. Most people neither want nor need it; [b]and certainly not at the price they would have to pay to validate the spend.[/b]



The NBN incidentally, sort of captures the Rudd-Gillard and now Gillard-Swan governments. Spend the money and worry about the bill later.

[url=http://http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/terry-mccranns-column/coalition-senses-electorate-doesnt-feel-need-for-speed/story-e6frfig6-1225903655505]Source[/url]

Why didn’t Oakes tell us about it?’ It might have helped us determine just how crappy his character is. He didn’t tell us about it because he was afraid to stick his neck out.

Couldn't agree more..

Wow, look at this, Julia is going to stop welfare payments for people who are not turning up for job interviews and new workers will be reimbursed up to $6000 for expenses incurred moving for a job in regional areas and up to $3000 for work in metropolitan areas. This is a good policy folks.



http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/election/julia-gillard-announces-proposed-welfare-crackdown/story-fn5zm695-1225903940745

This plan to stop welfare payments is so radical, I was a bit shocked, especially from a Labor government. I had no idea that the current rate of attendance for job interviews is only 58%. I would like to see the Liberals pick up on this idea, we all know that some families have been caught and stayed in the poverty trap - been on welfare for generations. This will no doubt cause some hardship, I hope Centrelink will show compassion to clients who really deserve it.

Wow, look at this, Julia is going to stop welfare payments for people who are not turning up for job interviews and new workers will be reimbursed up to $6000 for expenses incurred moving for a job in regional areas and up to $3000 for work in metropolitan areas. This is a good policy folks.



http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/election/julia-gillard-announces-proposed-welfare-crackdown/story-fn5zm695-1225903940745

Another copy cat policy nicked by the chief blob, from the Libs.

Is it Liberal policy koko?

Is it Liberal policy koko?

When John Howard initiated the intervention in the NT, he talked about holding back part of the dole, and issuing food certificates , or stamps in lieu.

Howard then said that, if re-elected, he would give serious consideration to utilising a similar overall system for the dole .

The current Coalition certainly talked about cuts to the dole after a certain amount of time.

So although not exactly the same, Labor has obviously realised there are votes in getting tough on social security. For which by the way they criticised The Libs.

So in that sense is a 'me too'.

Will be interesting to see what the Lib/Coal policy is on Social Security.

That's why I was so shocked at Labor taking the initiative, they are supposed to be more sympathetic to the needy. I will be interested to see what the Libs come up with too.

Did you watch Dick Smith's doco on population last night. It really made me think and I thought it was funny that Kevin Rudd initially said that he believed in a 'big' Australia, then not long after actually created a 'Population Minister'. I can see both points of view, the property developer said we need migrants for the country to grow and prosper - but we are bringing in all these people and we have no plan of what to do with them and where they will live - no water or infrastructure - a recipe for disaster. Immigration should be coupled with intrastructure. I think we owe Dick Smith a huge thank you for waking us all up!

Hi Toot--I recorded it and am waiting to watch it with my friend who also wants to see it--from what I have seen the other night--I think Dick has a very good point--maybe he should be PM ?

FirstPrev23456NextLast(page 5/6)
74 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment