Old Age Pension

This was written by Jenny Macklin on 3/6/2008. If you are on the old age pension you should read this full Statement. I'm trying to find out what party will be more sympathetic to us and I'm guessing it's the Labor Party.


[i]......By the 1950s, pensioners had moved from having to report to their local post office to receive a cash payment to receiving a hand-written cheque; in 1962 the residency test was halved to ten years; in 1966 Aboriginal Australians were granted full rights to the pension; and in 1975 the right of appeal was introduced.

And the Whitlam Government's introduction of benchmarking the pension to workers' earnings has seen a doubling of the pension in real terms since 1972. In his landmark 1972 policy speech at the Blacktown Civic Centre, Whitlam committed Labor to 'raise the basic pension rate to 25 percent of average weekly earnings.' A benchmark first achieved in 1974.

In 1983 the Hawke Government's Statement of Accord agreed to maintain the basic rate of pension at or above 25 percent of average earnings, a commitment reaffirmed by the government's statement, Better Incomes: Retirement Income Policy into the Next Century released in 1989. A series of increases achieved this benchmark over the life of the Labor government.

Under the Hawke and Keating Governments the pension increased from 24 percent of Male Total Average Weekly Earnings under the Fraser Government in 1982 to 25.8 percent on leaving office in 1996.

In 1990 the Hawke Government introduced the bereavement payment equivalent to 14 weeks pension payable to the surviving member of a pensioner couple.

And in 1994 the Keating Government introduced the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card.

Australia's Age Pension has endured through most of the 20th century and into the 21st century - 100 years of profound social and economic change, two world wars, a depression, recessions and booms - and, today, it continues its vital role in providing income support on the basis of need to older Australians. [/i]
http://www.jennymacklin.fahcsia.gov.au/statements/Pages/centenary_age_pension_05june08.aspx

74 comments

True Seth--it has happened b4, there are always those that take advantage

This was the result of an election poll from the Sydney Daily Telegraph half an hour ago.



If the Federal Election was held today, which party would receive your first preference?



Labor 14.07% (5095 votes)

Liberal 73.2% (26508 votes)

National 3.02% (1092 votes)

Green 4.31% (1562 votes)

Independent/Other 2.19% (792 votes)

None of them 3.21% (1164 votes)

Total votes: 36213



If this is any guide, Tony will be our new PM

Welcome back the lying howard years , if so.

This was the result of an election poll from the Sydney Daily Telegraph half an hour ago.



If the Federal Election was held today, which party would receive your first preference?



Labor 14.07% (5095 votes)

Liberal 73.2% (26508 votes)

National 3.02% (1092 votes)

Green 4.31% (1562 votes)

Independent/Other 2.19% (792 votes)

None of them 3.21% (1164 votes)

Total votes: 36213



If this is any guide, Tony will be our new PM

Online polls are notoriously unreliable.

The latest Galaxy poll has Labor's nose in front.

The Neilsen poll has the parties 50/50.

My guess is a hung Parliament with the Greens holding the balance of power.

If I'm right, and people think their pensions aren't adequate now.........hang on to your hats.

*****************************

Edit to add update.



Today's Newspoll has

Labor...52%

Lib/Coal.....49%

I was just thinking about that awful man Mark Latham. Remember when he nearly pulled John Howard off his feet with that famous handshake? Holy Moley, he could have been Prime Minister of Australia, thank goodness John Howard beat him at the polls.

Yes he is a bit of a loose canon





Online polls are notoriously unreliable.

The latest Galaxy poll has Labor's nose in front.

The Neilsen poll has the parties 50/50.

My guess is a hung Parliament with the Greens holding the balance of power.

[b]If I'm right, and people think their pensions aren't adequate now.........hang on to your hats.[/b]



Koko I despair of people who just dont think about the way things are going as they simply vote for Labor blindly because Dad did and they always have etc.



Biggest shock as they usually are the ones with no other income to help out a bit and they simply will not listen.



We are in danger of seeing the pension go down to the dole along with all other benefits - one level.



Suit the bureaucrats.



Suit Labor who cancelled the mature Age Pension in 1995 when thousands of folk still getting put off and not able to get another job at 50 let alone at 60! Also stopped the Widows Pension too same time.



So why they feel we are being alarmist when it is clearly in the Henry Report to do so and they only put it off until AFTER the election I suspect.



Labor people get into office or union reps and get a bit extra and go up in the world and have no real compassion for those they leave behind. Saw it time and time again working for a Labor Politician one time when in need of a job and he in need of my particular skills at the time. Put me off Labor forever seeing how they talk about the poorer folk behind closed doors and seemingly still do today years later!



People in NSW are really awake these days seemingly as they have the very worst of Labor and doing it tougher - not even putting in a woman will save them.

Didnt save them in WA nor in Victoria did it?



Question is will it save Federal Labor?



Hope not because as you say along with Greens in Senate and holding balance of power as they will - we are looking at lowered pension rate plus huge rise in the cost of living which is never ever compensated to the dole as they use the CPI and that never ever reflects the cost of living as they take off stuff - like the 30% rebate on private health which I feel is wrong as not 100% have it do they?



Speaking of which labor has ripped $300 million out of Medicare which will put up premiums and also will they say take the 30% back if re-elected as hate private health think all should be on one level.



You know the lowest level - which is why I have no compunction in saying they will take down the pension to one level lowest level the dole. After all, Julia Gillard's bio shows she has spent twelve years in Parliament, spent years as one of the bosses at the Socialist Forum (that's where the former communists went to continue their radical agenda) so not likely to disagree as she also disagreed according to RuddLeaks on giving Single age pensioners a rise at all.



It really is the most dangerous time for anyone on the pension or even a part pension or a SFR who could like so many lose their private incomes and rely on a age pension in future.





think about your own income hard and long before putting this woman back in the top job.



Far too many leaks and rumours and the Henry Report and even the previous report to disregard any of it.



No smoke without fire.

After once again seeing Abbott on the 7-30 report last night--how any one could think of voting for him--he once again proved he was a complete idiot

Yes PB, Kerry had him on the ropes about the broadband, he didn't have a clue. Not a good night for Tony.

lol-- never a good time for Tony--he doesn't have a clue about anything. How anyone can expect him to run a country I will never know--to me he is the George Bush of Australia

Who else thinks it was another sleazy attack on Julia,

by bringing out the mongoose,, latham.

an attempt to embarrass her in public.

Yes PB, Kerry had him on the ropes about the broadband, he didn't have a clue. Not a good night for Tony.



Should we take your logic to its conclusion, then neither Abbott nor Gillard , are fit to be PM because when announcing a health policy neither can perform open heart surgery, or announcing an education policy neither can conduct an ancient history lesson, or announcing a transport policy neither can fly a 747, or when announcing a defence policy neither can navigate HMAS Sydney.

If O' Brien was so knowledgeable himself, why did he have to look down and [b]read[/b] all the technical questions?



There are two things I glean from the debate, as a non tech head.

#1..There is no need to spend [b]$43billion.[/b]

#2..There is no need to nationalise.



Have a look at the bloke who is now second in charge of the country.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtEyAe1QqCg

or

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtEyAe1QqCg]Click here[/url]

I concede your point koko, Kerry did seem to be reading from something and it is an impossibly tricky subject.

I concede your point koko, Kerry did seem to be reading from something and it is an impossibly tricky subject.

Thanks for that Toot2000.

Acknowledgment is appreciated.

FirstPrev12345NextLast(page 4/6)
74 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment