Why Do We Have Kids?????.

OK, I'm going to put my head on the chopping block here, before I go on, for anybody who takes offence to what I'm about to type, please accept my apologies as it is not my intention to offend, and this is not directed at anyone person, it's just my opinion. 


WHY  DO WE HAVE KIDS???????  After reading all of the posts in the thread "How to handle Boomerang Kids," I find that the majority of posts seem to want to tip the kids out, if they don't fend for themselves they are losers,  make them stand  on their own two feet, only way to teach them etc, etc, etc, so I ask again, why do we have our kids??????,


For me I had my kids to love and nurture them from the day they were born until the day I die, (hopefully that is a still a long way off), growing up they never had chores to do (I had to do a lot of chores growing up and missed out on so many fun things with other kids because of it) in my mind they would have plenty of time to do that kind of work when they grew up, we never gave them pocket money as we felt we were dishing out an 'allowance' (the only rule Hubby put down before we were married was no 'house keeping'  that's what the bank account is for, so was the pocket money. As far as education was concerned, we asked them to go through to year 12 and from there they could go the path they wanted, only one, the youngest wanted to leave school to do a hairdressing apprenticeship, that was when she was in primary school,  I said OK, we'll see when you get through year nine, when year nine came she started talking about subjects she was going to do for year 10, I went through them with her (being very careful not to mention her hairdressing dream lol) she  finished year 12 and after she graduated I asked her why she didn't pull out in year 10, her answer, I wasn't going to be the only one (of the 4) who didn't go through to year 12.

I was a stay at home Mum so I was able to do a lot of volunteer work around the school, went on lots of excursions and many many school camps, I helped the teachers where ever I could, the kids always new I would be at the school somewhere. they all had after school activities which I ran them to, there was football, netball, chess, debating all being done at high levels, our two eldest, girl and boy, have medals from World Championships in their chosen sport, one daughter was an International Model and the youngest played National Netball.  They all  went to University after year 12. They are all lliving on 6 figure incomes, (lot better off than Dad & Mum lol)  We have excellent relationships with our In Laws and the extended family, All in all we are very lucky, however we have put in a lot of effort and hard work into the upbringing of our four children to achieve that outcome.

Why have I put all this forward, because we hear all the time how we do too much for our kids and the above mentioned thread that is currently runniing seems to portray that exact flavor,  I need to put out there that the 'tough love' that every body seems to want to dish out, and is believed to be the only way to 'train' the kids, is not necessarily always correct, well not for every one, I can only speak of my own experiences with my own children, remember we have 4 of them and not one went off the rails, you may say more good luck than good management but I say a hell of a lot of work, what you put in you get out, (all parents would do well to remember that.)

I did not have my kids to love and nurture for the first 15 - 17 years of their lives and then discard them, tell them to get out and to stand on their own two feet, why make rules as soon as they hit a certain age? weren't the rules there all along? Is parents love/ caring able to be switched off like a tap? after the tap is turned off are they on their own......  Do we have our kids until a certain age and then throw them out on the tip like a disused toy?????.... I wouldn't think so,  all my kids have got keys to the front door and they definitely do not knock to come into 'their' home, and it is, and always will be 'their' home, I cook when they are all here, it gives them a break from doing their own. We have regular family meals ( a group of 16) and regularly one of them will ring and ask what's for lunch or dinner, we're on our way. We are always welcome in their own homes and have never felt otherwise.

If the upbringing that my Hubby and I have given our kids is so wrong why then have we such a functional family, 4 kids, no drunkeness, no drugs, bail outs during teanage years, etc,etc, we are the kind of parents that have been ridiculed (for the want of a better word) throughout that thread, everything we've done has been mentioned to be the wrong way in lot of the posts, well I look at my family and just smile as a more loving caring and functional family would be hard to find.

When we have children we can only do what we consider is right for our own kids, we only get one shot at it, I don't understand why we must push them away from us just because they have reached a certain age, if the kids need help, why don't we help them???, if they want to stay with Dad & Mum why can't we see that that is a feather in the parents cap? because that's what it is. My son and Daughter In Law and 3 grandies are going to build a house, in the meantime they are going to stay with us, we have no hesitation with that at all, in fact we are looking forward to it, we are going to be a bit cramped but hey what the heck, (keep us young anyway) if we want to go away we have ready made house sitters lol.

I just wanted to put out there that just because you do everything for your kids doesn't mean they are going to try and rip you off or take advantage of you, enjoy your kids, no matter what their age because you never know that one day they or you may no longer be around. 

Just my thoughts after reading what I thought a very disturbing thread.  Cheers.

9 comments

Deanna, of course we always love our kids--and part of that love is to teach them to be independent and be able to stand on their own two feet--as you seem to have done--not go on paying their way throughout their life as many do. They should always be welcome to came home for meals--or stay for a time if they don't live close--and I know that I am always very happy to see them and cook for them then--however I would not be happy for them to move in and expect everything to be done for them ALL the time, with no input at all--as my friends have had--and still be treated very badly by their kids. I am lucky that mine all have their own homes and work hard to keep themselves.

I know of ones who do use their parents up, one of my nephews being one, my sister passed away when he was only 13 and I think he played on that, he went down a bad path but his Dad has stood by him all the while, his partner has just had a bub and they are living with the Dad who is running them around everywhere as neither have a licence, so yes I do understand that what you are saying. I do hope that is the minority though...........

We have kids because they are a bi-product of screwing.........mistakes.
That is the most usual cause.
I should have had my little snip sooner and had no kids because they were all a big problem.

Davey, in your somewhat crude way of explaining it, I do understand what you are saying,however, I personally shudder at the word "mistake" when used in this context, to me the result of parents having their five minutes of fun are not 'mistakes' they are 'surprise packages' and should not be blamed for their existence, which in many cases that I know of, are. In this day and age there is really no excuse for surprise packages, as you've explained you took the appropriate action albeit a little late.
Now that my kids are in their 30's I know ours turned out OK, but as I said in my post, it was damn hard work, some discipline x three times the love, we had our ups and downs as all families and relationships do but we've all come through with flying colours, as they say.
I do hope that you can get some enjoyment out of your child/ ren Davey, as they are, as you say, a bi-product of yourself so they must have some likeness to you. Cheers

Thats just sad, Davey. Deanna your post was great ,well done.wobbly

Thanks Wobbly, I have been a bit busy this week, spending a bit of time with the new grandson, his Mum had a migraine so needed treatment for that, they flew out to Cairns last night for a work conference, I can't wait to hear how he traveled on the plane.

Seggie. Hi Davey. Wondered where you had got to. I think we should hand you the big wooden spoon. You make me laugh but I guess that's not your intention? Have a good day.

We have kids because they are a bi-product of screwing.........mistakes.
That is the most usual cause.
I should have had my little snip sooner and had no kids because they were all a big problem.

+++++++++++

I don't think that is sad at all--if someone doesn't want kids then it is the most sensible thing to do--a shame more don't do it with the way SOME breed these days and couldn't give a hoot about them once they arrive.

Well said PlanB, it is a shame that more don't take a lot more care, in this day and age there is no need to be baring children who are not wanted.
I don't know how big the problem is but I know of some who have babies to get the very generous baby bonuses that seem to be around at the moment, that also is not a reason to have kids as you can bet your bottom dollar that the resultant baby is a 'not wanted bub', my heart bleeds for them. The lucky ones finish up with their grandparents.

Dividing the Australian population into 'breeders' and everyone else who is presumably libertarian and 'evolved' is so gay and Green Left.

Is that your intention?

Nautilus, Why does everything have to come down to Politics? this is not my intention at all, the question is why have kids? mainly if you don't want or don't have the time to love and nurture them, why have them? nothing political about that or even divisive for that matter. Cheers

'Breeder' is an unnecessary, offensive and provoking term and I stand by what I said. Its common meaning and usage in the media is relevant to this thread because the implication is that couples should not have the children they want. Australia achieved zero population growth many years ago and it is only through feckless, continued record immigration that our quality of life, sustainability and social security blow-outs have occurred.

Dividing the Australian population into 'breeders' and everyone else who is presumably libertarian and 'evolved' is so gay and Green Left.

Is that your intention?
+++++++++

Sorry do not understand your question Nautilus

I was meaning that unless you really WANT and intend to LOVE your kids then DO NOT HAVE them. So many these days have them either for the baby bonus or because they are to lazy to take precautions (or maybe to off their faces to know what they are doing)

You hit the nail on the head there PlanB.

PlanB
If it wasn't your intent to use 'breeders' to disrespect then I am sorry, but I did ask a question and not accuse you of anything.
Referring to single mums, the accusation was made before Whitlam and Whitlam's initiative to support single mums has been criticised, possibly unfairly, for increasing the problem he set out to solve.

No-one wants women to have children they don't want or don't want to care for and abuses will always occur despite the ready availability of education, contraception and abortion (indigenous women excluded because of their unfortunate circumstances). However I don't know what other solution there is that will hope to care for the produce of their unfortunate choices.

Yes, I know that in some quarters some women are accused of having the three spaced children to bludge off Centrelink for life and also there are the drop-kicks of men who believe they should pass on their genes wherever possible but not take care of them. There is also a prevailing view of entitlement among western women that someone else is always obliged to look after their progeny (their fertility choice, their children, but someone else pays), with the State stumping up as the 'mum and child supporter' of last resort.

Some of us didn't bother, and a good thing too!

And in some cases No.5 that's a good thing...

Heh, heh, Deanna, that nearly resulted in java over my new screen.

LOL

Pretty close to the truth Davey welcome back

9 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment