RSPCA slams new poultry guidelines

Australia’s leading animal welfare organisation has firmly distanced itself from draft new national Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines for Poultry, saying they are inadequate and not based in science or evidence.

RSPCA Australia CEO Heather Neil said the organisation had been vocal in its criticism of the Standard and Guidelines process for some time, but was still shocked and outraged by the quality of the resulting draft, which was released to the public on Monday.

“To put it bluntly, we’re gutted. These standards are an embarrassment and the community should respond to them as such,” said Ms Neil.

“The RSPCA is recognised nationally – and indeed, internationally - as Australia’s leading authority on animal welfare, and that reputation is built upon our commitment to well-informed, evidence-based policies and positions.

“These Standards are not based in science, are not sustainable, and will not improve farm animal welfare in line with community expectations.

“Nowhere is this more apparent than in the fact that these Standards will not commence a phase-out of cruel battery cages for layer hens, despite overwhelming scientific evidence and growing international condemnation of this production system.

“Instead, they propose to condemn over 100 million inquisitive, social, and intelligent layer hens to lives of abject misery inside barren battery cages for the next decade or more.

“This is morally and scientifically indefensible.

“This approach goes against everything we stand for, and indeed, everything that caring Australians stand for – as confirmed by recent research showing 84 per cent of Australians want to end the battery cage.

“New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the entire European Union have decided that battery cages must go, why is Australia falling behind?

“We want to be very clear that the RSPCA cannot support these standards, and will be encouraging our many supporters to vocally oppose them as well,” said Ms Neil.

“State and territory governments will soon have to decide whether they want to continue endorsing a cruel and outdated system or whether they will be part of the future of humane and sustainable agriculture.

“Now is the time for Agriculture Ministers to step up and show leadership,” said Ms Neil.

Once finalised, the standards will govern the way approximately 700 million layer hens, meat chickens, turkeys, and ducks are treated in Australia’s commercial poultry industries each year, for at least the next decade or more.

Join the movement to end the battery cage at endthebatterycage.org.au

11 comments

It seems that the RSPCA is a paper tiger.

I have given up eating chicken

I have gone vegetarian, Raphael.

Great Twila

I will too eventually, still love a good steak every so often

and seafood

But eating plenty of veggies now.

The size of the thanksgiving turkey in the USA has increased by 50% since the 60's. The avg size is now 31lb. Does anyone know of a man, under the age of 50 who has an adult son who is smaller?

Oh dear. More bleeding hearts!

The way all Animals that we use for food are treated is down right appalling!

Very cruel and unnecessary. Folks sign the petition.

ps: more people are buying cage free eggs than ever these days. I don't mind paying a bit extra because I've visited one of those battery farms and did not like it. 

Me too Reagan. Ive been buying RSPCA approved cage free for years.

We can wring our hands and call the practice cruel. But really, who amongst us wants to tackle the real problem?? High Wages and cost of living. Yes our economic success has its downside too. Why have all the chooks scattered far and wide and employ extra staff to collect eggs in a quad bike and trailer?? 

There is NO need for them to be boiled alive though is their Frank?

No, not at all!!

Petition signed

All forms of animal agriculture are incredibly cruel and the worst thing for the health of both you and the environment.  Most of us have been slaves to big industry profits for decades because of ignorance but now social media has provided evidence of the awful truth.  Eating a plant based diet is the fastest growing lifestyle choice in many countries, including Australia, so why not get on the right side of history now?

Where do we draw the line? Several studies have shown plants feel pain when uprooted. The smell of freshly mown grass is in fact a chemical distress signal. Good thing we can't hear it, otherwise we'd be deafened.

"Right side of history'? from the beginning of time animals were kiling each other to eat and survive. In my opinion as long as it's done humanely, we need to have meat in our diet. Respect for the animal is what is required.

Kiah, plants don't have brains or central nervous systems.  Is there really a humane way to kill someone else that doesn't want to die?  The large whites of their eyes show that non-human animals know what is ahead for them at the slaughter house - they are terrified as you would be.  Would you be happy for a kitten or puppy to be killed 'humanely' for human taste buds?  Battery hens are only 18-24 mths old, still teenagers, and meat chickens are 35 days old, still chirping but with huge breasts and legs that can't support their gross weight.  Many meat-free alternatives are available now in supermarkets to make kindness easier - why wouldn't you embrace it? Forget barn laid or free range - for every egg laying hen, a male chick was ground up alive or gassed at one day old.  Half a cup of apple sauce or half a mashed banana does the job of an egg when baking, without the cholesterol. 

 

 

go veg!

You are correct.  There will come a time in the future when people will look back at us as  with horror that we eat "animals," sentient creatures ... creatures that don't want to die ... creatures that can feel fear and pain.

Yes I agree KIAH, respect and humane treatment -- and I am sure you are right every living thing has feelings -- yes even vegetation

11 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment