I agree with you there. Mandating will not happen though - that would place the Government in the position of being able to be sued for any damages. Scott Morrison is already aware of this.

What the Governments might do instead is allow employers to sack people who don't take the shot- or to limit their shifts so much that they may as well not have a job - and can't survive. Or, Governments may find other ways to make the lives those who cannot or wish to avoid the shot for various reasons, miserable and impoverished.  

I doubt very much if safety or care for community or care for individuals is of concern to Governments anymore. There are many people who cannot physically tolerate Adjuvants in shots and other reasons why their health does not allow them to go ahead - and there is also the consideration of the experimental nature of this particular shot. 

There are also so many power gains evident for Governments to avoid backing off now.  They make more laws to enable them to be there  'lawfully'. 

So much has been invested in terrifying the world over so many months and are on track for diminishing populations and wealth for the middle and lower income groups.  

The next gens educational levels have been successfully thwarted as students have dropped out due to all the opening and closing of schools, universities. Good educators without pay had to find other ways to survive. Without International students, universities  had to release highly qualified lecturing.   

All this occurred due to lockdowns of everyone rather than following the law of the Australian Biosecurity Act. This Act mandates that in a pandemic,  to 1.  ONLY isolate the sick.  AND 2. Preserve the economy.

The Australian Biosecurity Act was blatantly transgressed and still is being illegally transgressed.  

Therefore, old and new businesses have collapsed. So many teen kids have dropped out of school, Universities have lost so many of their students. Many of these had almost completed their degrees. Suicides have magnified.
Families prevented from saying goodbye to their elders are now in deep grief.The elders were left isolated.  
Elders not visited lost will to live. Funerals could not be attended. Marriages could not happen.
Relationships between people in different states who planned on being together, split up.  
Pets died as people were suddenly stuck where they were and unable to get home to feed them. 
 Domestically violent people have had trapped victims at their mercy - nowhere to escape tyrants even for a few hours a day.  

Kids in shared parenting situations were  often left stuck with a destructive parent because they could not cross a border to get home to their primary carer parent.

People died through being unable to access life saving surgery or to begin cancer treatments, or to access hospital care whilst in lockdown.  

Mental health issues have of course, magnified. The latter is not surprising also given that most people have been taught in this society that being 'extroverted' is the 'way' to be.

Most cannot cope well with being isolated.  

Still, these horrors will not make those who know that their health cannot cope with shots, to go ahead and do so.
Neither will this push people into risking  an experimental shot knowing full well that there is no insurance company that will pay out for health damage  should there be adverse responses or death.  In any case, adverse responses are highly censored.

GP's risk losing their medical licenses if they speak up to admit any shot causes an issue.
Most often, adverse responses result in denial and claims that the person is just looking for a reason and being irrational in believing their medication played a part.
Adverse responses are likely to be highly underreported due to the above. 
Most of the public realise this.

Governments also realise that a high percentage of the public know this. Governments have, in any case, been clearly informed of it - so they will not at this point, risk further infuriating so many of the public as we move toward an election year.

If they manage to drag  out the drama until after the election - and if the public vote in one of the major political parties, it is likely that Martial Law to support the Fascist state is brought forward - and then Governments will do exactly as they wish to do and none of the public will have any say in anything whatsoever again.  

Privately run aged care facilities are the Federal Governments responsibility and as such they have been incredibly neglectful.

Labor has just been doing its job. 

I agree with you Sophie.   All aged care workers should have the vaccination - to me it is a no brainer.

The number of recorded deaths from vaccinations in Australia, BillF2, is 1. The TGA report has been misused and the correct reading of the report is in this link: https://www.aap.com.au/meme-misuses-australian-data-to-falsely-claim-covid-19-vaccine-deaths/

The media has been instructed to NOT report anything that would deter people. This has been stated by the PM publicly and you can find evidence for this yourself when you look. 

So I looked. There have been 210 deaths after having the vaccine - not from the vaccine. You are talking rubbish Ra.

Here is the truth from the TGA website: https://www.tga.gov.au/periodic/covid-19-vaccine-weekly-safety-report-27-05-2021

"To 23 May 2021, 3.6 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been given in Australia. In this period, the TGA has received 210 reports of deaths following immunisation – 109 have been reported for the Pfizer vaccine, 94 for the AstraZeneca vaccine and seven where the vaccine was not specified. Most of these reports (93%) were for people 65 years of age and over, and over three quarters were 75 years of age and over. Many of the deaths relate to elderly aged-care residents.

The TGA reviews all deaths reported after vaccination and monitors for safety signals. Part of our analysis includes comparing expected natural death rates to observed death rates following immunisation. To date, the observed number of deaths reported after vaccination is actually less than the expected number of deaths."

Take particular note of the last sentence.

You say, "The media has been instructed to NOT report anything that would deter people. " 

I can't believe that you would think that this would ever stop the media. In any case, who would instruct them?

You need to take your conspiracy theories and fake "facts" to another website.

Actually no, it is highly recommended, but not mandatory. No employer can make any vaccination mandatory. If they do, they are not only breaking the law, but they become personally liable financially and ethically for any adverse reaction or death in relation to that vaccination. This is Australian law.

Worth reading and taking note:

https://www.yourlifechoices.com.au/health/covid19/getting-a-covid-jab-is-safer-than-taking-aspirin/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=YourLifeChoices%20Wednesday%20PM%20Update%2030%20June%202021&utm_content=YourLifeChoices%20Wednesday%20PM%20Update%2030%20June%202021+CID_ab7d50a46fdc43513591d86881e2c172&utm_source=campaign%20monitor&utm_term=Getting%20a%20COVID%20jab%20is%20safer%20than%20taking%20aspirin%20says%20professor

No. It is explained here: https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/learn-about-covid-19-vaccines/how-covid-19-vaccines-are-tested-and-approved