Myer family member's 'mind blown' over reef call

A member of the Myer family dynasty who played a key role in establishing the Great Barrier Reef Foundation (GBRF) has condemned a $444 million federal grant to the body as “shocking and almost mind-blowing”.

The grant, reported as the largest to a not-for-profit group, is to be funnelled to projects researching ways of preventing further degradation of the reef.

The latest comments increase pressure on Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull for making what critics branded a “captain's call” in allocating the funding to a group of just six foundation staffers, without due diligence or tendering the grant.

Michael Myer was a financial supporter of the GBRF and a member of its board for two years until 2002, when he quit in part over concerns about the growing involvement of figures from the fossil fuels industry.

Yesterday, it was revealed governance experts and lawyers from Environmental Justice Australia believed the grant contravened the government's own guidelines.

Mr Myer said his scathing views on the grant were informed by almost 40 years' involvement in the Myer Foundation, one of Australia's leading philanthropic organisations.

He said the GBRF board and its supporters came to feature “a lot of players” from fossil fuel-oriented industries, which raised “big questions” about climate change impacts on the reef.

“There is a cognitive dissonance … on the one hand saying the reef is really precious to us, it’s an icon, we must protect it, but on the other hand actively pursuing policies that have the opposite effect,” he said.

Do you believe, as the Federal Opposition does, that the GBRF should hand the grant back to the Government?

FirstPrev12(page 2/2)
18 comments

Thanks for the photo RnR, lovely colours, better than those criminals above.

Handing back the grant makes very little sense to me. Cutting it down might be more appropriate. The reef needs help, but all is definitely not lost. There are positive signs for good recovery. Corals are quite hardy, they are made up of tiny modules, called polyps, that are joined together to form colonies. Most of the polyps in each colony can reproduce, and this obviously means that larger colonies can produce more larvae. This is happening right now.

Reefs with more different colonies living on them can produce more larvae overall, providing a supply of new corals that can disperse to nearby damaged reefs and kick-start their recovery, again this is all apparent and very heartening for scientists. In places where corals have died on just a few reefs among many other healthy reefs, the supply of larvae from the neighbouring healthy reefs can facilitate more rapid recovery. 

 

Smacks of corruption

There should be a criminal investigation

Someone has started a petition:

https://www.change.org/p/malcolm-turnbull-return-the-444-million-given-to-the-great-barrier-reef-foundation-by-improper-process?

Thanks musicveg.

I owe yoiu a steak dinner :)

Very funny olbaid, you know I don't eat animals, give it to a homeless person for me.

Ignore Brocky, he can't eat steak anyway - no teeth!

Within weeks of learning it would receive a grant worth nearly half a billion dollars, the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) Foundation treated mining and banking executives to a weekend of snorkelling and sunset drinks.

But the trip also included accommodation and meals at the expensive Qualia Resort, trips to yacht clubs and guided snorkelling tours. Attendance was only available to the affiliates who paid the $20,000 foundation membership fee, including BHP, JP Morgan, Rio Tinto, Shell, AGL, Commonwealth Bank, Deutsche Bank, Boral Limited and many other companies.

The foundation set 25 per cent of that fee aside to fund the Hamilton Island trip, rather than ensuring all of it was spent on projects to improve the reef.

Full ABC story.

And a little more …

Media Watch: Today host Karl Stefanovic revealed as a ‘brand ambassador’ for the GBR Foundation.

Ugly, even uglier than the fish in the photo. I guess the businesses that hosted their trip did well then.Wonder who owns the resort?

Perhaps it was to "encourage" those companies to doonate after the CEO's were a tour and a presentation on the destruction of the reef

:( How could you call that fish ugly ... I think Maori wrasse are magnificent creatures.

Some of the most beautiful I have seen on many trips to the reef.

Re ownership.

Hamilton Island was purchased in 1975 by Keith Williams and subsequently developed. In 1992, the resort was placed in receivership and between 1995 and 2003 it was owned by BT Australia and managed by Holiday Inn for a portion of that time. The late Bob Oatley an Australian winemaker and his family purchased Hamilton Island in 2003.

The Oatley family has spent more than $450 million on improvements to the Island and inject more than $16 million a year into operating the Island. Sandy Oatley, is Chairman of the Island's Board. One of Sandy's two daughters, Nicky Oatley, is brand manager and Ros Oatley's son Robert Oatley is in the investment team.

Olbaid ... hopefully that strategy is successful but I still have my doubts about granting so much public money to the GBRF without due process.

Perhaps others could have done the job better and still secured private funding to assist.

How would we ever know if the usual application process is ignored?

I agree . As i said before, smacks of corruption.

There should also be clear deliverables attached to the grant - what it can and cant be used for and paid in installments based on third party certified progress reports

There should also be clear deliverables attached to the grant - what it can and cant be used for and paid in installments based on third party certified progress reports.

Totally agree.

FirstPrev12(page 2/2)
18 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment