Government doesn't want you to share food

The Weekly Times is reporting that federal Labor is considering banning the sharing of game meat, presumably on health grounds.

Not sure how they will police this. You shoot a deer halfway up the side of a mountain, and suddenly the police appear to make sure you eat it all yourself?

My dad was an avid game shooter, and personally I never want to eat a wild duck again, but if another family wants to share their bounty with their neighbours why not? Especially if it is a pest animal.

Good luck enforcing that.

11 comments

My goodness, what next. Here we are facing a cost of living crisis, electricity could become intermittent and prices are sure to skyrocket and some bright spark wants to police people eating feral animals. I presume that rabbits are also "game meat" and I remember with fondness seeing my father and my husband returning with some lovely plump rabbits for the pot. Are we to be ruled by city folk who have no idea how people in regional areas actually live?

Another stupid law.

Wires seemed to be crossed in comments above as the laws are about sharing game meat not stopping hunters killing their own game. 

So, Tom Tank, my husband shot the rabbits, not me, so if I eat some rabbit is he not sharing "game meat"?

I think some people make it up just to put down the new Government.

I don't think the new government will need any help to be put down. They only had a plan to get elected and now they don't know what to do next except blame the previous government for what economists have been shouting from the rooftops was going to happen with interest rates and inflation.

Horace, the LNP had been complaining and blaming Labor for the past ten years. Remember 'debt and deficjt' until the LNP multiplied it? Morrison couldn't open his mouth without blaming Labor for his own inactions. The big injustice is that Morrison isn't having to clear up the mess he and his party created but the public were clearly sick of his arrogance, profligate spending, pork barreling and lies. When a PM is hated equally by the locals, our biggest trading partner and a key ally it's time to go.

This makes no sense at all.  I feel that it has been taken out of context.  Sensational reporting ... no.  Brainless reporting ... yes.

Hopefully clarity will be forthcoming soon.

https://theconversation.com/banning-wild-meat-is-not-the-solution-to-reducing-future-disease-outbreaks-181647

I bet if this goes through, it will only be for whites and not blacks in Oz!!!

No, the Greens would want to amend the bill to ban hunting altogether and to relocate the animals together with the mice.

Sounds like a total beat up to me. 

Any wonder I don't bother to read and engage in any useful discussion here. The threads are consistently taken over by right wing partisan views from people who use every topic to vent their spleen towards anything even slightly left of center. Are most people here sycophants of Credlin, Bolt and Alan Jones or members of the National Party ? I'll stick to bi-partisan forums that are at least moderated more effectively.

Did you have a spot of game meat for din dins tonight, hence the distemper?

Would it possibly be .... one has to suspend belief ... that this relates to the question of COVID resulting from eating infected meat and the powers-that-be don't want to see this occurring here.  Albeit the "hunter" can risk infection but no one else.

Hang on people, Victoria is not the only place banning sharing of wild meat, it’s all to do with covid. You can still kill and eat your wild alligator as long as it’s processed by a licenced facility. Failure to comply can mean 24 months in the clink.

Lucca, you've slipped in as I was typing my comment.  So is the discussion concerning a proposed Victorian State Law?

It's a pretty long bow to draw to think that the sharing of wild caught foods in any was increases the chances of spreading Covid or any such virus.  If that is their excuse, it looks as if science has well and truly left the Victorian Parliament.

Your point on processing in a licensed facility could be stretched to include any fish that may be caught by any recreational fisher man or woman.

BTW, it would be a very unusual event if anyone caught an alligator in Australian territorial waters.

Jan, I do not have access to the Weekly Times story and the article in "The Comversation"  that Pacahawi kindly gave us he link to doesn't appear to have any relevance to Australia.  Perhaps we can hope for some more information in due course.

I would hope that if any Bill was to be introduced to the Australian Federal Parliament that the public would get to see the full text and be able to discuss and if needed debate it before it gets presented.

If a person has legitimately caught and butchered such wild game as deer, goat, pig or kangaroo, I would think that they should be at liberty to distribute their catch as they saw fit.

Just note that "game" could extend to and include fish. Which could be interesting for those who've filled the Esky from a trip to the beach or out in "the bay" and seek to share their catch with friends, family and neighbours.

11 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment