First post, albeit a disgruntled one.
I have been receiving the Life Choices emag for a long while, and have only just found this forum. However, I wouldn't say I was exactly a fan of Life Choices at this point due to what I see as a fairly commercial, sanitised and slightly shallow approach. That should make me popular for starters!
I just read one of the headings which invited me to investigate the "solution" to obtaining travel insurance for those with pre-existing conditions. Those of you who are older and suffering from any one of many conditions will understand the problem.
Far from being a "solution", the article pointed me towards a commercial insurer operating under the Allianz umbrella, with a link to their terms and conditions which preclude rather than accept many pre-existing medical complaints.
As a suffer of cardiomyopathy for many years I have always had to demonstrate fitness, but in recent years Allianz has adopted a draconian approach and refuses to consider cardiomyopathy at all! I would not be recommending that firm, and neither should Life Choices, who I suspect recommend them simply because they have an advertising relationship.
In my view, Life Choices should be providing more of an advocacy role rather than simply promoting their advertisers. Similarly, why not tackle some of the serious issues such as euthansia, rather than doing the sugary recipes and light stuff to the exclusion of the more serious issues.
I would be more impressed if the magazine adopted an advocacy, lobbiest and progressive forum for the older population rather than simply printing an email valium and coating it with sweet stuff and selling dubious commercial advertising. Sweet stuff is wonderful, and I love a good laugh - but not to the point where the more important issues and politically sensitive matters are buried under the carpet.
Its a sad fact of life, oldfart that a commercial venture such as this website must keep an eye on the "bottom line". That means we dont always get what is best for us, but rather what is best for the site. For me, at least, your points are well taken and I too would like to see more depth in the "journalism" here and a stronger focus on the issues and wellbeing of older Australians.
I have seen too many articles purporting to offer information/solutions/details on some issue or another only to find the "article" pussyfoots around the issue and gives us a link to say, Centrelinks website where we must do the real research ourselves.
I am reminded of that old trueism "you get what you pay for in life" and this site is free ....... something we must all keep in mind.