Federal budget
There seems to be an attitude of “Let’s pretend the struggling age pensioners don’t exist and perhaps the problem will go away."
I’m so disappointed and disgusted in the Rudd government’s lack of concern for the elderly in their twilight years. I felt sure when I voted for them that this would be a different Govt who would care for all the battlers in Australia, not just the working families. Please remember the struggling pensioners of today were the working families of yesteryear.
Shame on you Labour! How much longer are you going to sit on your hands and ignore this issue?
The bottom line is that we desperately need a decent $30.00 per week rise in the age pension. The elderly need your help. When do you intend to deliver an increase in the age pension?
[b]JD Maleny[/b]
As a single, senior Australian who is still working because of fear of ultimately coping on an aged pension, the Government's assistance to seniors in the budget is extremely discouraging. Most members of Parliament will never need face a future of living (or rather, trying to live) on less than $300 per week. Bob Brown seems to be the only one who has any idea of the situation and is to be congratulated for his advocacy for pensioners.
I would hope that a review will be more than words and that action will follow, especially in increasing the pension for single pensioners. Unless something is done in the near future, the social disadvantage will impact on the wider community.
[b]MQ[/b]
Whilst my wife and I have been fortunate enough to be basically self funded and receive a part pension we both find it very disappointing that the Labor Government appear to have looked after their "working families" and completely ignored our aging population. What can we do to tell Mr. Rudd that us "oldies" have just as much rights as "workers rights"?
[b]Alan N[/b]
Subject: Federal Budget – Removal of Medicare surcharge
So Rudd has stated that couples earning up to $150,000 per annum are on Struggle Street. This level of income is of course the taxable income. Gross income is liable to be as high as $250,000 with the addition of tax plus salary sacrifices so popular today.
Why do people on this level of income need another $1600 added to their income.
If these people are on Struggle St then I wish I was one of them.
What does Rudd call a pensioner couple on $26,000 per annum?
With the ever increasing cost of fuel and groceries I find I am at least $50 per week worse off than two years ago even taking into account increases in the pension?
A reduction in tax is of no value to a couple on the basic pension as they do not pay tax on such a meagre income.
When pensioners try to earn a little extra income to take them above the subsistence level of the pension then a couple pays 40% tax (20c in the dollar each over a meagre allowable income level for ever dollar they earn.)
It seems that what ever pensioners do to lift their income above a subsistence level then the Federal Government has their hand in their back pocket. (deeming rates)
I believe my concerns are reflected by the thoughts of all pensioners who have been passed over and trust that your publication will take this matter up and bring the plight of pensioners to the notice of the Federal Government to ensure that those in real need receive first consideration...
[b]D G H Helensvale[/b]
The budget was a disgrace for older Australians, just cast aside, so much
money available, we were migrants in the fifties, worked hard for Australia,
but, the powers that be have little interest in us now.
[b]Fay Spurgin[/b]
The budget was a disappointed from pensioners’ point of view. Ironically, it should empower the voluntary euthanasia lobby.
[b]June, NT[/b]
I totally agree with your comments and Senator Bob Brown comments; that the senior citizen of Australia have been left to dry at cost of a lot of younger Australians as at their age they carry no or little political clout. It is the shame of our (current) government, who spend millions on committees and little on outcomes.
"It seems that whilst our nation has been told many times that "demography is our destiny" the swelling numbers of older Australians are of little, if any, concern to our politicians"
I encourage the 'AboutSeniors ' to continue to apply pressure on the government. It seems that the older Australian are 'punished' for getting older and not rewarded for having contributed to the Australian Government Taxation for many well over 40 years of work.
[b]Fred Lucas[/b]
I hereby wish to highly protest at the way we, especially single aged pensioners, are dealt with by this government. We have contributed to the health of the nation, and the little regard this government is paying to his eldest members, is a disgrace and a pill hard and bitter to swallow. I voted this government in power at the last election, I feel this has
been the greatest mistake I ever made.
[b]Jean Pierre[/b]
The biggest mistake it appears the pensioners have done is to have fought in the wars to provide a free country that enables fat cat politicians to keep getting increases in their wage. Perhaps the pensioners should also have their pensions reviewed by the remuneration tribunal.
[b]Daniel Hooper[/b]
I am a self funded retiree caring for my demented mother.
I choose to care for her at home but need regular breaks to travel with my husband and have a life of my own
Each year we take several week long breaks and a long break of 4 weeks. There is the problem of what to do with mother. I did not imagine that my life would be ruled by the number of day available in respite care. 63 days is not enough 100 days is more like it. I save the government thousands of dollars.
I do this willingly but do need to consider myself and my husband's needs as well.
I don't need money - I need time to myself
[b]EL[/b]
I do appreciate greatly, the Pharmacy rate for Prescriptions.
I do appreciate greatly, the transport Pensioner rates.
I do appreciate greatly, not having to pay Car Registration Fees
I do appreciate greatly, the Utilities Allowance.
I, Marlene born in Sydney 1941 began working in 1959 and completed my
employment in 1997. I was never on unemployment benefits, worked most diligently every
single day, until I had to retire on Disability Pension through contacting Rheumatic Fever at
the age of 21 even at that time having 9 months off work, never collected sickness benefits
from the Government.
Why I didn't commence employment until 1959, I was a sickly child and missed a lot of schooling,
hence having to repeat some classes. I eventually achieved my Intermediate Certificate much to
my surprise and worked doing office duties all my life. I didn't stop to have babies.
I consider I deserve a bigger payment than $273.00 per week, as I helped build this country
I began on very low wages, had to pay my mother most of my wages in rent, as she had 4 children
and paid to put all of us through college plus I paid my own Conservatorium fees.
TODAY 2008...........(1)
But, how else are we to survive at a standard that we were used to when we worked?
We weren't given the benefits to achieve a great retirement when we did retire..as they have today.
The best Superannuation deal came out in 1975 (I think)... but me paying rent in my
apartment, not being able to financially buy my own, nor give me enough to save
that much. Paying lots of medication etc.
TODAY 2008.....(2)
I live in a mobile home, which I purchased, I still have to pay $95 per week for site
fees. Thank you, yes I do get rent assistance.
I have a telephone bill, (and thankfully you help towards the bill and my broadband).
The hide to have Foxtel connected for my entertainment.
Green slip insurance. My Motor vehicle insurance. PLUS THE PRICE OF PETROL.
which visits to mother who lives in Petersham and other relatives are very limited
So outside entertainment is also limited. Including any entertainment at all.
My House and contents insurance
The huge Medicare difference I have to pay when I see my heart specialist,
astrologist, eye surgeon and I had to have an OTC test on my eyes
this week which cost $80 and no refund from Medicare.
I happen to own 3 stray cats, I feed God's birds that frequent
my place here at Leppington, and stray cats at the shopping centre.
SO I HAVE CREDIT CARDS TO GET ME OUT OF ALL THIS MESS...
Having to pay the minimum amount each month with huge interest fees
is a very sorry state indeed.
Oh yes, and where does the money come from to buy clothes???
mostly from the charity shops.
I am amazed that we who built this country, including my mother and father, are on these
limited dollars. I think it is disgusting. No I don't work in Parliament House anymore where the
staff were delivered their much reduced price luncheons on a silver platter by waiters in their white coats.
As a pensioner, we are now reduced to this squaller level to survive.
I wasn't one of the luckier ones that were left an inheritance and I am one of the majority.
Now what's this about bring in more Kiwi's?????????? our own can't get work so are they going
to be put on huge unemployment benefits, with free food, clothing and of course,
a beautiful new Dept of Housing Villa fully furnished with $2.20 water bill usage a fortnight,
plus repainted when necessary and new hot water systems replaced free, of course in the event
of it breaking down.
AND a rent of $50 per week???
I AM TOTALLY DISGUSTED, THE ELDERLY ARE NOW ABUSED, TO BE FORGOTTEN ABOUT, NOT GIVEN THE BETTER DRUGS AND TO LIVE LIKE 3RD WORLD CITIZENS - DEFINITELY NOT THE STANDARD WE WERE BORN AND BRED TO BE IN THIS ONCE BEAUTIFUL COUNTRY. EVEN THE
MIGRANTS CAN SHARE 2 PENSIONS...... WOW...... THE MESSAGE HERE IS:
"THE GREY HAIR SET, KEEP YOUR PLACE AND SHUT UP'!
WELL TO THAT I SAY, 'THANK YOU KIND SIR'
AMEN.
[b]Marlene S[/b]
G'day from Nowra
Sorry to be a nark but I am fed up with concentration on single pensions!!!!!
We as a couple are just as badly off if not worse.
Single $273 PW Couple $228 each $4 less PW $90 per week combined less or $180.00 per two weeks
Pharm Allowance Single $2.90 PW Couple $1.45 PW
When it comes to Phone again the single amount is split between the couple utilities allow again it is split between two. they say 2 can live as cheaply as one it is pure rubbish.
A couple use twice as much food as one twice as much toilet paper twice as much of every thing yet we get less.
Couples have a higher amount to reach for Pharmaceuticals before getting free medicine.
The lump sum helps and should stay.
People in our situation in community housing lose 25% of our pension payments every time it rises they even take 25% of the rent assistance and they cannot get their grubby little fingers on it quickly enough.
It is time to give both sides of the story.
[b]Reg Newsome[/b]