Expect traffic congestion to get much worse

New research from the University of Adelaide has predicted that driverless cars could worsen traffic congestion in the coming decades, partly because of drivers’ attitudes to the emerging technology and a lack of willingness to share their rides.

Using the City of Adelaide in Australia as a test model, researchers surveyed more than 500 commuters, including a mix of those who travel to work by car and public transport, and modelled the potential impacts.

“Autonomous or driverless vehicles are likely to have profound effects on cities. Being able to understand their impact will help to shape how our communities respond to the challenges and opportunities ahead,” says study co-author Dr Raul Barreto, from the University of Adelaide.

This research investigated commuters’ views on autonomous vehicle ownership and use, vehicle sharing, and their attachment to conventional vehicles.

The research team then explored potential vehicle flow, with a mix of autonomous and conventional vehicles, and land use change in the Adelaide CBD under different scenarios.

“Our findings show that Adelaide has the potential to significantly reduce the number of vehicles on the roads and improve traffic flows, however these benefits may not be achieved in the near to medium term for many reasons,” Dr Barreto explained.

“The key factors affecting the transition to autonomous vehicles are commuter attitudes to car ownership and wanting to drive themselves, rather than have technology do it for them, as well as the price of new technology, and consumer attitudes to car sharing.

“Our evidence suggests that as riders switch to autonomous vehicles, there will be an adverse impact on public transport. With most commuters not interested in ride sharing, this could increase peak period vehicle flows, which is likely to increase traffic congestion over the next 30 years or so.

“Under both scenarios we tested, the number of vehicles overall will eventually drop. However, total vehicle trips may increase, and some of the predicted benefits of autonomous vehicles may not eventuate until a lengthy transition period is complete.

“Our findings have policy implications for how the transition to autonomous vehicles is managed, not just within the City of Adelaide but for other cities around the world,” Dr Barreto explained.

Would you use an autonomous vehicle for transport in the future? Would you be more willing to ride share in this situation?

7 comments

Good thing about the driverless cars, no drivers to get out and bash each other. This is Perth in peak travel times.

Image result for traffic congestion in perth

I believe Albanese is aware of our problems,he's been talking about them on his present visit. He's  visiting our dynamic state so frequently, wonder if there is a lady involved? Sorry Albo, just having a bit of fun!!

Driverless or autonomous vehicles will make a huge difference to our cities, but they're a long way off. The Australian Driverless Vehicle Conference starts in Sydney this weekend, and once again they'll be discussing whether autonomous vehicles will try to kill you, how to integrate driver-controlled and non-driver-controlled vehicles, how to establish when a driver should take control of an autonomous vehicle and lots more. 

You can read more at http://www.seniordriveraus.com/driverless-cars-will-change-the-face-of-our-cities/

and 

http://www.seniordriveraus.com/will-a-driverless-car-deliberately-try-to-kill-you/

 

I have serious reservations over diverless cars Perhaps I am just an old fogey but there are issues involved that are being papered over by the proponents of these cars who are perhaps getting carried away with the technology and not really taking on-board reality.

I have serious reservations over diverless cars Perhaps I am just an old fogey but there are issues involved that are being papered over by the proponents of these cars who are perhaps getting carried away with the technology and not really taking on-board reality.

Driverless cars are not going to solve the problem. They will need to use the same congested roads.

The Federal and State Governments must ensure infrastructure keeps up with the (questionable) high population growth.  Better roads, improved and affordable public transport, decentralization of industry and office complexes away from the capital city CBD's. Incentives to move to regional cities and towns etc. 

These are key considerations if we are to reduce traffic congestion.

Driverless cars will not ease congestion. If we all swap our current cars for an electric one that drives us automatically, there will still be the same number of vehicles on the roads. We need to remove cars or at least stop adding to the numbers.

Improve public transport, make it go where people actually want to go so that they will use it, improve/install segrgated bike paths and link routes, improve pedestrian access and above all reduce immigration to limit the number of people overpopulating the country that does not even have enough reliable natural resources to support them.

Actually, they will make a huge difference because they can travel virtually nose-to-tail without the risk of them tail-ending each other and move as a group to minimise hold-ups and blockages. But improved public transport should be a priority - it grabs a lot less headlines but is still the best solution.

Oh goody then. We could get even more cars into the same space. No congestion easing then!

Australia is overpopulated: that's why the bigger cities have so much traffic congestion. SOLUTION = ZERO immigration, and start deportation of Chinese and Indians (the main culprits) and Muslims.

We could start with all the dumb Aussies who make such ignorant suggestions.

7 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment