Does the Truth Pay?

ANDREW NEIL: Julian Assange is reckless, stupid and a narcissist - but this is why he should NOT rot in an American jail

ANDREW NEIL: Home Secretary Priti Patel has signed an order to extradite Julian Assange to America, where he is wanted on 18 charges of espionage and could be imprisoned for life

11 comments

What do you feel should be done with this Australian?

 

Julian Assange cannot be seen as a journalist.  Journalists have a very strong code of ethics ...and they don't put lives at risk.

Assange displayed no code of ethics ... and indeed put lives at risk.

However, enough is enough.  I think he should be returned to Australia and serve out whatever punishment he attracts.

I agree, Assange is a narcisist, reckless and very stupid.  A horrible little man.

 

Assange may actually have saved lives of innocent civilians. Remember a significant embarrassment of the USA revealed by Assange was the pilot of a helicopter gunship murdering a family of Afghani civilians. The prospect of further similar revelations may have had a moderating effect. I understand the crew of this helicopter were not tried or jailed so why Assange?

What do you feel should be done with this Australian?

I don't care. Let the law take its course.

Assange has essentially done nothing wrong by publishing secret documents leaked to him by an activist American soldier who felt that the truth needed to be told about the war in Afghanistan. Assange printed the documents and embarrassed America and now America wants to show the world what happens to people who embarrass it. Assange may be sentenced to 175 years in gaol merely to cover that embarrassment. The soldier who leaked the documents was freed after 7 years in gaol. 

It must be a solstice or a stellar event because I'm in agreement with Horace Cope.  Another rare event I also agree with the Chinese foreign affairs spokesman who pointed out the hypocrisy of the USA which would happily spy on and reveal the secrets of other countries but takes serious action when it was similarly embarrassed. 

I find it totally hypocritical of the Australian government which has gone to great lengths and expense to free and defend Australian drug mules imprisoned overseas who put thousands of people's lives at risk at home but have so far refused to defend Assange for blowing the whistle on US government criminality.

The Australian government has form when it comes to journalists, Viking. Remember the Balibo 5 and the government of the day ignoring the murders because it might have upset Suharto.

Viking and Horace Cope,

May I assume that you admire Julian Assange ... and condone what he did?

Professional journalists have a strong code of ethics and whilst adhering to "freedom of information" are careful how this is presented. Many journalists report from war-zones.  They are careful not to report in a way that endangers lives.

 

Julian Assange named sources ... they subsequently disappeared ...!!

Journalists never reveal their sources.  Some have even been incarcerated for this.

 

Axel, I don't admire Assange although I respect his resilience under very difficult circumstances. I don't know if he is a journalist but he is certainly a whistle blower. I  don't agree that journalists never reveal their sources, attribution is very common.

 Firstly I find  the discrimination of the Australian government and their picking and choosing of who to support, totally hypocritical. The US and UK fight for their citizens regardless. Australia is clearly scared of upsetting the US.

Secondly, the USA which refuses to submit to international war crimes scrutiny hides behind great secrecy and threatening whistle blowers like Assange with life sentences. There is no evidence that any lives were lost by Assange's actions, if there were tell us who? On the other hand American war crimes were exposed. I don't believe any country should be able to commit war crimes and then cover them up, however I assume that you do?

 

"Mr Lewis said the dissemination of specific classified documents unredacted put dissidents in Afghanistan and Iraq at "risk of serious harm, torture or even death".

The US identified hundreds of "at risk and potentially at risk people" around the world, he said, and made efforts to warn them."

Assange released material without any care about the consequences.  Just riding high on ego.

No, I don't believe war crimes should be covered up.  But there are due processes to investigate these.

Assange is a dangerous, deluded and nasty character . Whether this has to do with his early growing environment or a mad gene, who knows. In all seriousness, the man needs to be confined. He’s not a journalist, he’s an accomplished hacker, been doing it since his teens.

In 1987, aged 16, he began hacking under the name Mendax which in Latin means “liar” and that is what he is in reality, a liar. He and two others known as Trax and Prime Suspect formed a hacking group called “the International Subversives.” Let this man out of prison and he will do even more damage. Why should Australia trying to build good relations with the US and other countries, defend him, that would be madness.

Lucca,

I was unaware of Assange's history.   Thank you for providing this man's background.

I hope others on this forum read it.

I cannot understand why people support him.

11 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment