Are parts of Australia ‘no go’ for housing?
Should people be allowed to rebuild on land that is constantly at threat from floods or fires?
Each year we see tragic stories of homes and lives destroyed in catastrophic natural disasters but with a better planning could many be avoided?
It’s heartbreaking to watch, but housing on bush blocks and continued development in flood-prone areas seem to be on a collision course with Australia’s climate.
Strict planning rules are not new. On many parts of the Murray River housing is not allowed to be built below the 1956 flood level, considered the one-in-100 year flood event.
Understandably many people want to stay in their home town, but some areas will very soon become uninsurable.
Instead of rebuilding, would it be better for government to help people move to another area?
Considering all the continual flooding I think it is high time the Federal Government make areas out of bounds for housing! Unless they want to do some work on making the areas a bit higher!!